Ganesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42420 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2021 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
Ganesh Yadav, Son Of Late Rajendra Yadav Village- Kasaha Tola Ward No2, Ps- Triveniganj Dist- Supaul 2.
Ramchandra Yadav, Son Of Late Surendra Yadav Village- Kasaha Tola Ward No-2, Ps- Triveniganj Dist- Supaul 3.
Shiv Chandra Yadav, Son Of Late Surendra Yadav Village- Kasaha Tola Ward No-2, Ps- Triveniganj Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 144, 149, 447, 427, 114, 341, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on orders of Kapildev Yadav, accused Ganesh Yadav assaulted him by spade causing injury on head. Thereafter, other accused assaulted him by lathi, Ramchandra Yadav assaulted by sword causing injury on head and thereafter, Shiv Chandra Yadav by an iron rod causing injury on leg.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42420 of 2023(2) dt.08-08-2023 2/2
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation, it would manifest that the blow was not repeated and the injuries suffered by the injured is simple in nature as would be evident from Annexure-3 to the anticipatory bail application.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P. S. Case No.232 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T