Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9306 of 2023 ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Son of Kabilash Choudhary, R/o Village and P.O- Parsadi English, Arwal, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary-cum-Mission Director BPSM, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary-cum-Mission Director BPSM, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Director PM Poshan Yojna, Bihar State Mid Day Meal Scheme Samittee, Patna.

6.

The District Magistrate, Arwal.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Ranjan, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar (GP-4) Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-4 Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 3-5-2023 disposing of his representation made against his transfer from one block to another within the control of respondent No. 6.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the contractual existence of the petitioner is not

2/4 transferable.

4. In order to ascertain the right of the petitioner to continue in the same office in which he was appointed on contract basis, the Court allowed the petitioner time to place on record the terms of his contract. The same has already been placed on record. The original order of his contractual appointment is dated 11-9-2012. He submits that he was required to fill up an agreement as per Parisist (पररिरशिष)- 1. He places reliance on clause 1 and clause 6 of the same, which read as follows:

"1. यह रनिययोजनि ककवल ककायर्यपकालक सहकायक कक पद कक रलए रकयका जकाएगका।

6. संरवदका परि रनिययोरजत व्यरकत ककी सकवका सकामकान्यतका स्थकानिकान्तरिणकीय निहकी हयोगका।"

5. This Court would also consider is appropriate to take note of the terms and conditions in Clause 6 of the petitioner's initial appointment on contract basis vide order dated 11.09.2012 which reads as follows:-

6. वक अपनिक रनियसंतकाधकीनि पदकारधककारिकी तथका अधयोहस्तकाक्षरिकी दकारिका ससौंपक गयक ककायरसं एवसं रनिदर्देशिशों कका ससमय अच्छक ढसंग सक रनिष्पकादनि/अनिनुपकालनि करिरेंगक। ककायरसं मरें लकापरिवकाहकी / संपकारदत ककायर्य कक असंतयोषजनिक पकायक जकानिक परि रबिनिका नियोरटिस इन्हरें रनिययोजनि सक हटिकानिक कका पूणर्य

3/4 अरधककारि अधयोहस्तकाक्षरिकी कयो हयोगका। चयरनित ककायर्यपकालक सहकायक कयो आदकशि रदयका जकातका ह रक कक आधकारि परि रदनिनांक 17/09/12 तक संबिसंरधत रनिययोरजत ककायर्यालय मरें रनिरश्चित रूप सक दकनिका सनुरनिरश्चित करिरें। उकत रतरथ कक पश्चिकात ययोगदकानि स्वकीककारि निहहीं हयोगका। ककायर्यपकालक सहकायक कयो अपनिक सकाथ ननमन कम्प्यपूटिरि / हकार्यवकयरि लकानिक हशोंगक।

1. एक रकस्कटिटॉप (Processor P4 or above, RAM- 1GB or above, OS WINDOWS XP or above)

2. एक रपसंटिरि (BLACK & WHITE)

3. एक यपू०पकी०एस०

4. इसंटिनिनिकटि कनिककशिनि संबिसंरधत ककायर्यालय पधकानि कयो रनिदकशि रदयका जकातका ह रक उपरियोकत सकामगकी कक रबिनिका ककायर्यपकालक सहकायक कका ययोगदकानि स्वकीककारि निहहीं करिरेंगक।

6. The purport and intent of the above quoted clauses by no stretch of imagination can be taken to conclude that petitioner cannot be transferred from one block to another. As long as he is within the control of the authority who has appointed him on contract basis, namely, respondent No. 6 there is no enforceable bar to petitioner's transfer. This fact is apparent from the terms of petitioner's initial engagement. Clause 6 of the same casts an obligation on the petitioner to obey the directions of the controlling officer (respondent No. 6).

7. The petitioner's transfer is intra District and within the control of respondent No. 6. The same, thus, requires no

4/4 interference.

8. Writ application is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U