← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36415/2019bail granted

Nakul Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36415 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Siwan ====================================================== Nakul Chauhan aged about 27 years (M), Son of Late Ramanand Chauhan Resident of Village-Laxmipur at Present R/O- Dakhin Tola, P.S.- Siwan Town, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2019 in connection with C III 90/2019 for the offences alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 27 litres of country made liquor. The petitioner has already suffered for about two months in custody. The petitioner is an accused in one prior case in which he is on bail.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Siwan in connection with C III 90/2019 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36415 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T