Dinesh Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16568 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2016 Thana -BEERPUR District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Dinesh Paswan, Son of Late Brahmdeo Paswan @ Bannu Paswan,

2. Rohit Kumar, Son of Suresh Paswan, Both 1&2 are R/o Village- Maida Babhangama, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 326, 307/34 Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners of assaulting the mother of informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that only general and omnibus allegations of assault has been levelled against these petitioners. Further it is alleged that petitioners had come armed with pistol, however, it is alleged that petitioners assaulted the mother of informant by means of lathi and danda, which shows that they had no intention to kill her. petitioners are in custody since 29.01.2017 and 02.02.2017 respectively. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, nature of allegation and the period of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16568 of 2017 (3) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 custody, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Begusarai, in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part two appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T