Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40109 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2025 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Chandan Yadav S/O Chandradev Singh @ Chandu Yadav Resident of villageBanthiya saren, PS- Nimchak Bathani, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ajay Paswan Village - Telhara, P.S. Telhara, District - Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parth Sarthy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Telhara P.S. Case No. 27 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner enticed away the minor daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40109 of 2025(5) dt.11-09-2025 2/2 in nature. There was love affair between the petitioner and the victim. It is further submitted that there is contradiction between the voluntary police statement of the victim and her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation levelled against the petitioner of enticing away the minor daughter of the informant. It is further submitted that the victim has supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. The prayer is rejected. The trial Court is directed to expedite the Trial expeditiously.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T