Chandan Tiwary @ Vishal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22695 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -775 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== Chandan Tiwary @ Vishal, Son of Late Madan Tiwary, Resident of Village- Housing Board Colony, Girija Chowk P.S.- K. Hat, DistrictPurnea. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) PS case no. 775 of 2017 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 of Indian Penal Code.
The allegation is regarding the petitioner having committed theft in the house of the informant and subsequently, when the house of the petitioner was raided by the police, stolen articles were recovered.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fact is that the articles recovered from the house of the petitioner are not stolen but belongs to the petitioner himself and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22695 of 2018 (3) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 only after being implicated in the present case, the petitioner has been made accused in other five cases, hence the petitioner was infact having a clean antecedent prior to his implication in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 01.11.2017.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner made at bar to the effect that prior to the filing of the present case, the petitioner was having a clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in five other cases only after his arrest in the present case, I deem it fit and appropriate to release the abovenamed petitioner on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) PS case no. 775 of 2017. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T