← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49628/2021bail granted

Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49628 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2021 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== PAPPU KUMAR S/o Judge Singh Resident of Vill - Laharabad, P.S. - Piro, Dist. - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

According to the prosecution case, one Dharmendra Paswan had gone to be easy near to Balua Tola near Baha par where the accused Golu Kumar with some unknown persons shot him as a result thereof he died during course of treatment.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49628 of 2021(3) dt.24-03-2022 2/3 further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. He further submits that during course of investigation, the informant has taken the name of the petitioner as one of the accused. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that allegation of firing upon the deceased is attributed to the co-accused, Golu Kumar. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 01.06.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 169 of 2021 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49628 of 2021(3) dt.24-03-2022 3/3 without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T