Saroj Kumar Yadav @ Saroj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37025 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Siwan ====================================================== Saroj Kumar Yadav @ Saroj Yadav Son of Jyotis Yadav @ Jyotish Lal residence of village- Hakam, Police station- Siwan (Mufasil), Mahadeva O.P., District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 5.400 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner where the other family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37025 of 2020(2) dt.15-04-2021 2/2 members also reside. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 5.400 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge IIndcum-Special Judge, Excise, Siwan in connection with Excise case No. C-III 21/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T