Pradeep Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13487 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13487 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2016 Thana -KOCHAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar, son of Dr. Permanand Singh, resident of Village- Kochas, Police Station- Kochas, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Jai Prakash Singh, Son of Late Ram Chandra Singh, resident of VillageSorathi, Police Station- Dinara, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 18 of 2016, registered under Sections 420, 406 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

The accusation is that petitioner being the employee of Bonanza Portfolio Limited issued cheque of Rs.7,50,000/- in favour of complainant-informant, which was dishonoured due to insufficient money in the account.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner being the employee of Bonanza Portfolio Limited issued

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13487 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017 several cheques to different persons in the name of company but due to non-availability of the money in the account cheque were dishonoured and petitioner has no intention to cheat anyone. The petitioner is in custody since 31.03.2016.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 18 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T