Raj Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20509 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year- Thana- District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar Rai, S/o Late Ram Preet Rai @ Ram Briksha Rai, resident of Village- Maheshwara, P.S.- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with P.R. No. 64 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

The allegation is regarding recovery of 6.300 kg. Ganja from the house of the petitioner upon a raid being conducted by the officials of the Excise Department. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, the quantity of Ganja recovered from the house of the petitioner is not a commercial quantity as per the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 and the petitioner is having a clean antecedent. The petitioner is stated to be languishing in custody since 29.12.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20509 of 2018(4) dt.28-06-2018 2/2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with P.R. No. 64 of 2017. The petitioner is directed to be present on each and every date so fixed before the concerned court and in case of any default, the present privilege of bail shall stand cancelled and the petitioner would be taken into custody forthwith. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T