Ram Darshan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11735 of 2015 (2) dt.27-04-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11735 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2013 Thana -MANJHI District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Ram Darshan Singh Son of Late Ram Rup Singh Resident of Village - Kabirpar, P.S. - Manjhi, District - Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Shantanu Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02/ 27.04.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Manjhi P. S. case no. 159/2013 registered under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he gave spade blow to the informant as well as his brother. The impugned order reveals that informant sustained, altogether, three injuries said to be caused by sharp cutting weapon. The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioner also sustained grievous injury on his person. It is further contended by him that alleged occurrence took place on account of land dispute. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition stands
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11735 of 2015 (2) dt.27-04-2015 rejected.
However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the concerned court in connection with Manjhi P. S. case no. 159/2013 within four weeks from today and seek regular bail and if he does so, the concerned court shall consider regular bail application of the petitioner on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order, particularly, keeping in mind the facts of the case and counter case and also taking note of this fact that the petitioner had also sustained grievous injury in the alleged occurrence . shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T