Kanhaiya Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45780 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-572 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Kanhaiya Kumar Yadav, male, aged about 27 years, son of Late Bal Krishna Yadav @ Late Bal Krishna Yadav resident of village-Pipra, P.S.-Saur Bazar (Patarghat O.P), Distrist-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with S.T. Case No. 132 of 2024 arising out of Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 572 of 2023 for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 14.08.2023, by the informant, Raj Kumar Paswan.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he works as a cash collection agent in Radiant Cash Management Service Ltd. and on the fateful day, after collection Rs.08,61,062/- kept it in a bag was hanging in the handle of his motorcycle and as he was moving towards Punjab National Bank, the accused intercepted and fled away with the bag. Accordingly, the F.I.R.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45780 of 2024(3) dt.18-09-2024 2/2
4. Subsequently, the police investigated the matter and picked up the persons with criminal antecedent, petitioner is one of them and on the confession of accused persons Rs.01,25,000/- recovered from a place where they had hidden it.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that once an accused implicated in such cases, cases after cases are lodged and this is one example.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that not only fifteen cases are there under his belt, on the confession of the petitioner as also other accused persons, there is recovery of Rs.01,25,000/-.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts as also his criminal antecedent, for the present this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of bail.
8. Accordingly, the prayer for bail stands rejected.
9. Since the petitioner is in custody, the trial court is directed to look into the matter and see to it that the trial moves at an earliest.
(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T