← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38179/2026bail granted

Baleshwar Turi @ Baleshwar Turiya v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38179 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2026 Thana- Gurupa District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Baleshwar Turi @ Baleshwar Turiya Son of Harigilas Turi @ Harivilas Turi Resident of Village- Telani, P.S.- Gurpa, District- Gaya. 2.

Amiya Devi @ Ambiya Devi Wife of Baleshwar Turi @ Baleshwar Turiya Resident of Village- Telani, P.S.- Gurpa, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Gurpa P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026 registered for offences under Sections 324(4), 326(g), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners, along with others, entered the informant's house, broke its roof and uprooted the hand pump installed outside. They also filled the borewell with bricks and stones. Thereafter, they set fire to the household articles and allegedly stole jewellery and cash kept in the house.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38179 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. It is further submitted that they have been falsely implicated in the present case on account of a family dispute relating to purchased land properties. He also contends that earlier also two false cases were instituted at the instance of the prosecution.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. I have considered the submissions of the parties and have gone through the records of the case. From the impugned order, it appears that nothing has been found at the place of occurrence.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

8. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gurpa P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38179 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3

9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T