← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37630/2019bail rejected

Md. Gulab @ Gulal @ Md. Gulal v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-23Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37630 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2018 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

MD. GULAB @ GULAL @ MD. GULAL S/o Late Md. Isshu Miyan Resident of Village- Dighra Rampur Shah, P.S.- Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 2.

Bachan @ Lakhindra Ram S/o Late Vishwanath Ram Resident of VillageDighra Rampur Shah, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Muzuffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 322 of 2018 for the offence registered under Sections 363 & 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one of the co-accused person has been granted bail by the Court below Diary of the present case was called for which has since been received.

After perusal of the case diary, it appears that the victim girl in her statement made under Section 164 has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37630 of 2019(3) dt.23-08-2019 2/2 categorically stated that the petitioner along with Md. Saheb and Bechan @ Lakhindra Ram had forcibly taken her in an auto and thereafter, she was taken to the station. Thereafter, they took her away to Anand Vihar and confined her in a room till 24.05.2018 whereafter, she was released by the culprit on the said date. Considering the fact that the petitioners have been specifically named by the victim girl, namely, Chanda Kumari, who is a minor aged about 14 years, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T