Ajit Ram @ Anjit Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38249 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2025 Thana- TURKI KHARARU District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ajit Ram @ Anjit Ram Son of Ashok Ram Resident of Village- Madhopur Chikni, PS- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur, ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard the parties.

2.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Turki P.S. Case No.70 of 2025 registered for the offence under sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3.

The petitioner is said to have kidnapped the victim girl, who is aged about 17 years.

4.

The victim girl in her statement recorded under section 183 of the B.N.S.S., has stated that she had herself left her house and went to Delhi and started working in a hotel and where she met with the petitioner and got married with him. 5.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the statement of the victim girl

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38249 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/2 recorded under section 183 of the B.N.S.S., this bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court below, in connection with Turki P.S. Case No.70 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482 of the BNSS. 8.

It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T