← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49548/2021withdrawn

Dhamu Mahto @ Subhash Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49548 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2021 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== DHAMU MAHTO @ SUBHASH MAHTO S/O Sipahi Mahto Village Hat Sairiya, P.S. - Bairiya, Dist. W. Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-10-2023 This case has been listed under the heading 'To Be Mentioned' at the instance of office.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

3. Office has reported that the progress of the case is showing dismissed as withdrawn but neither the order-sheet is attached with the file nor any order is available on the website of this Court.

4. After making enquiry, it came to the light that this case was disposed of during the Pandemic period while the Court was working in virtual mode and office was also running with restricted number of employees.

5. It appears that this case was listed on the Board, but at that time the court was taking restricted number of files and learned counsel mentioned this case out of turn since the file could not be made available by the office, as the office was also functioning through restricted number of employees, the order could not be typed, signed and uploaded. The following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49548 of 2021(2) dt.10-10-2023 2/2 order deemed to have been passed on 04.02.2022.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application submitting that during pendency of this application, the petitioner has already been apprehended by the police.

7. Permission is accorded.

8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U