Golu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39560 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== Golu Singh S/O Late Manoj Singh R/O Vinova Gram ward no -6 PS-Janki Nagar, Dist.- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with R.S. P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 dated 23.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) of B.N.S. (392 of IPC), later on the charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 310(2), 317(3) of B.N.S. and 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that three unknown miscreants came riding on a motorcycle and snatched the bag containing Rs. 2,60,000/- of the informant at the gunpoint.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The charge-sheet has been submitted against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39560 of 2025(2) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 petitioner. It is further submitted that police recovered looted articles i.e. Aadhar Card, Stamp of factory mohar and Rs. 9500/- from the house of the co-accused namely Sanjay Yadav. The confessional statement of the co-accused made before police which has got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with R.S. P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shivam/- U T