Sahdev Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36429 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2019 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Sahdev Ram (Male) aged about 60 years Son of Late Mungalal Ram Resident of Village - Jogia, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani. 2.

Belai Paswan @ Bhelai Paswan aged about 50 years Son of late Sugadeo Paswan Resident of Village - Jogia, P.S.- Ladaniya, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 28.03.2019 in connection with Jay Nagar P.S. Case No. 163 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 180 bottles containing 300 ml each of Nepali liquor. The petitioners have already suffered for more than two months in custody. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II Madhubani-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Jay Nagar P.S. Case No. 163 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36429 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives .

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Vikash Jain, J) BT/- U T