← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25425/2016bail granted

Siyalal Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2016-06-29The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25425 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -202 Year- 2015 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Siyalal Sahani S/o Aklu Sahani resident of village - Chandrahati via Kurhani, P.S. Kurhani, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 This is an application, made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accusedpetitioner, namely, Siyalal Sahani, in connection with Paroo Police Station Case No. 202 of 2015, under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Perused the above application and materials on record.

Heard Mr. Sandeep Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State. In view of the fact that the accused above-named has been in custody since 31.08.2015 in connection with the case aforementioned and perusal of the materials available does not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25425 of 2016 (2) dt.29-06-2016 2/2 reveal such incriminating materials, which would warrant further detention of the accused-petitioner in custody, and in view also of the fact that the perusal of the materials does not reveal that the accused-petitioner's liberty on bail would adversely affect his trial, it is, in the interest of justice, hereby directed that the accused above-named shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Paroo Police Station Case No. 202 of 2015.

This direction for bail is further subject to the condition that the accused above-named shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence and shall appear, in the learned Court below, as may be directed.

In terms of the above observations and directions, this bail application shall stand disposed of.

Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) U T