Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13947/2017bail granted

Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-27Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13947 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -278 Year- 2016 Thana -BALIA District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Sudhir Kumar, Son of Kailash Ram, Resident of Village-Balha Bazar, Punarwas, P.S.-Mansi, District-Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2016 in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 278 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 452, 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner and informant are well acquainted from before and so far allegation against the petitioner it is alleged against the petitioner he has just gone to meet her and nothing has occurred as alleged. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 01.12.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence, period of custody and also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13947 of 2017 (2) dt.27-03-2017 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 278 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T