Jitendra Roy And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16338 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2016 Thana -PHENHARA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Jitendra Roy, Son of Ramdev Rai,

2. Rupesh Tiwari, Son of Badri Tiwari, Both are resident of village - Madpa Kothi, P.S. Fenhara, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 29-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners are accused in Phenhara P.S. Case No. 58 of 2016 for offences under Section 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is demand of Rs. 5/- lacs from the informant on mobile phone failing which the informant will have to face dire consequences. In para-3 of the petition the petitioners have stated that they have no criminal antecedent. The petitioners have remained in jail for more than five months and the charge sheet has been submitted on 19.2.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16338 of 2017 (3) dt.29-05-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Phenhara P.S. Case No. 58 of 2016, subject to the condition that they will not, in any manner, influence the witnesses and will extend all proper co-operation in the conduct of the trial.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) S.Pandey/- U T