Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44975/2013dismissed

Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-05Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44975 of 2013 ====================================================== Renu Devi Wife Of Sri Manish Poddar Resident Of Village- Manjhaul Achchelal Tola, P.S. Cheria Bariarpur (Manjhaul) In The District Of Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narain Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-07-2016 Heard Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh , learned senior counsel who was assisted by Sri Prabhu Narain Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The sole petitioner, has approached this court invoking its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a prayer to quash an order dated 21.8.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 5th , Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 779 of 2011 arising out of Naw Kothi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2010 registered for the offence under section 302/ 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. By the said order discharge petition filed on behalf of the petitioner for her discharge under section 227 of the Cr.P.C. was rejected.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44975 of 2013 (3) dt.05-07-2016 2/2 save and except confessional statement of the petitioner there is no other material. It has further been submitted that father- in -law of the petitioner have lodged a complaint before the authority concerned disclosing the name of the accused persons who were participant in the occurrence, however to the reasons best known to the police the petitioner has been made accused. Besides hearing I have also perused the material available on record. In this case earlier by order dated 24.10.2013 photo copy of case diary was called for which has been received. I have perused the case diary. On going through the case diary the court is satisfied that there is no illegality in the order whereby discharge petition was rejected.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T