Savru Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38091 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2026 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Savru Bind S/o- Sagar Bind R/v- Lakhmanpur Ps- Chainpur Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua 2.

Pramod Bind S/o- SAvru Bind R/v- Lakhmanpur Ps- Chainpur Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua 3.

Sudami Bind @ Sudami Devi W/o- Pramod Bind R/v- Lakhmanpur PsChainpur Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua 4.

Sushila Devi W/o- Savru Bind R/v- Lakhmanpur Ps- Chainpur Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Chinpur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2026 registered for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners no. 1 and 2 along with other accused including the petitioners no. 3 and 4 are said to have caused grievous injury to the injured by throwing brick battle. They are alleged to be smugglers of illicit

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38091 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 wine and when the misuse of electric connection was protested by the informant, the occurrence took place.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. The petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4 claims clean antecedents, while petitioner no. 1 has two criminal antecedent. The allegation levelled against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. There is also a case and counter-case between both the parties.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the allegation and the injury of the victim, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners no. 1 and 2.

7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application for petitioners no. 1 and 2 are hereby dismissed.

8. So far as the petitioners no. 3 and 4 are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations against them.

9. Accordingly, let the petitioners no. 3 and 4, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38091 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chinpur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

10. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T