Diwakar Paswan @ Dibakar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39508 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2022 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Diwakar Paswan @ Dibakar Paswan Son of Pravin Paswan R/O VillKasimpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Braj Bhusan Poddar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2022 registered on 27.01.2022 for the alleged offences under Sections 394, 397, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, while the informant was returning after withdrawing Rs. 2,47,000/- from the bank, which she kept in a bag already containing Rs. 10,000/-, three unknown miscreants snatched the bag containing Rs. 2,57,000/- at gunpoint and on resistance being shown, they shot at the cousin father-in-law of the informant. The miscreants also took away the mobile phone of the informant's cousin father-in-law. The name of the petitioner transpired during investigation as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39508 of 2025(2) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 one of the miscreants.
4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no recovery from the petitioner and some of the accused persons in this case have already been granted bail by this Court.
5. The petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2025 and the participation of the petitioner in the alleged crime has come during investigation. The co-accused persons in their selfinculpatory statements, have named the petitioner as one of the co-accused.
6. Considering the fact that the petitioner and others have shot at the victim/informant and looted a huge amount and the petitioner has same criminal antecedent also, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U