Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27322/2016bail granted

Munarik Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27322 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2015 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Munarik Yadav, Son of Meghan Yadav, Resident of Village Mohandih, P.S. Dobhi, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2016 in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 182 of 2015 for the offence alleged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion as the first information report has been instituted against unknown persons and has been made accused on his own extra-judicial confessional statement and has been remanded in the present case. He is on bail in respect of other cases in which he is accused.

4. In the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner (Munarik Yadav) be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27322 of 2016 (2) dt.14-07-2016 2/2 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 182/2015 subject to the conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on three consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U T