Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18016/2017bail granted

Karu Sah @ Karu Saw v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18016 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2015 Thana -HALSI District- LAKHISARAI ======================================================

1. Karu Sah @ Karu Saw Son of Late Mahadeo Saw, Resident of VillageTetarahat, P.S.-Halsi, District Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Halsi P.S.Case No.163 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B) & 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner that he is brother-in-law (Bhaisur) and he is named in the F.I.R. under Section 304B & other Sections of the Indian Penal Code It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the allegation is general and omnibus in nature and he is in custody since 17.9.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of nature of allegation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18016 of 2017 (3) dt.20-04-2017 2/2 being general and omnibus as well as he is brother-in-law (Bhaisur), the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai in connection with Halsi P.S.Case No.163 of 2015 dated 16.11.2015. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U