← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7645/2015disposed

Nityanand Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-24Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7645 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Nityanand Singh, son of Late Shaligram Singh

2. Surendra Prasad Singh, son of Late Ganga Prasad Singh

3. Manju Devi @ Manjula Devi, wife of Late Shyamal Kishore Singh All resident of village Bhatgama, P.S. Chausa, District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector, Madhepura.

3. The Land Acquisition Officer, Madhepura.

4. The Circle Officer, Chausa, District Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hare Krishna Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2015 Heard the parties.

For the grievances raised on behalf of the petitioners, as indicated in para 1 of the writ petition, they have a remedy before the statutory authorities under the provisions of The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short 'Act, 1894'). In the writ petition filed on behalf of the petitioners complete facts have not been disclosed. Neither the date of award nor the copy of the award prepared under the provisions of the Act, 1894 have been brought on the record. It appears that the petitioners are not satisfied with the quantum of compensation paid to them. That being the position, they have a remedy under the provisions of the Act, 1894.

In above view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to raise their grievances before the statutory authorities, as indicated above.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7645 of 2015 (2) dt.24-08-2015 If such a petition is filed, then the competent authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law.

The petitioners shall be at liberty to raise all the issues of facts and law before the statutory authorities, which may be available to them.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U