← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44030/2024bail granted

Bishu Rai @ Bishnu Kumar Yadav @ Vishnu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-11Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44030 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2024 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Bishu Rai @ Bishnu Kumar Yadav @ Vishnu Rai S/O Rajendra Rai R/O Village-Samsuddinpur, P.S. Rivilganj, Distt-Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of four cases.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 500 litres of liquor from Diara area near K.C. College.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated based on the secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone. It is next submitted that it appears

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44030 of 2024(2) dt.11-07-2024 2/2 that the police in order to save the real culprits falsely implicated the petitioner taking advantage of his antecedent.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 55 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, the learned trial court, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner, shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T