← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40195/2026allowed

Gudiya Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-23Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40195 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2026 Thana- Singhaul District- Begusarai ====================================================== Gudiya Kumari D/o- Pramod Ray R/o- Vill.- Rachiyahi - Vrahatpur, ward no. -03, P.S.- Singhaul, Dist.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 103(1), 61(2), 238, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that Pramod Rai has assaulted with sharp cutting weapon on the head of the informant's brother due to which he fell down. On this the wife of the accused Pramod Rai exhorted her to kill him on this Manish Kumar fired at brother of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from the perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the allegation of assault is against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40195 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 Pramod Rai and one Manish Kumar. The petitioner is the daughter of Pramod Rai though she has been arrayed as an accused but there is no allegation against her of any overt act. She is only the member of mob as per the case of the prosecution. He has further been submitted that petitioner is a lady. A statement has been made in para-3 that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.03.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Singhaul P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. IV, Begusarai. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sneha/- Dolly/- U T