Ravi Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20846 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Ravi Prakash son of Vijay Kumar Singh, resident of village Sinwo, P.S. Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabua.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sada Nand Ray For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ajit Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 09-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the informant.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhabua P.S. case no. 130 of 2015, registered under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC with an allegation that one Sheela Devi being wife of main accused sold certain land in favour of the plaintiff which actually did not belong to her. The petitioner herein was a witness thereto. It is submitted that another co-accused namely Om Prakash Singh who is also a witness to the document has since been released on anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for the informant has not disputed the aforesaid contention of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20846 of 2015 (2) dt.09-07-2015 2/2 is inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Bhabua P.S. case no.130 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T