Jitendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7891 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1134 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM (DARIGAON) DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Singh, son of Shri Singh, resident of village Bhadokhara, P.S. Tilauthu, Distt. Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 1134 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charge sheet has already been submitted in the case. The petitioner is in custody since 3.10.2016. He has no criminal antecedent. There is allegation that one loaded country made pistol was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is mentioned in the impugned order itself that charge sheet has already been submitted. It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Keeping in view the clean antecedent of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7891 of 2017 (2) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 petitioner and the period spent by him in custody, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 1134 of 2016, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner.

The petitioner is directed to remain physically present in court on each and every date till disposal of the trial and any two subsequent defaults will result in cancellation of bail bonds in the court below.

It is made clear that in the event criminal antecedent has been found against the petitioner prior to grant of bail by this Court, the court below will be at liberty to take appropriate action for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T