Rojiyak Khatoon @ Rojiya Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37524 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rojiyak Khatoon @ Rojiya Khatoon W/O Akhtar Dewan Village- Madho Pur Tansariya, Ward no. 8, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gulnar Begum For the Informant :
Mr. Madhurendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 77/2025 dated 26.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80(2) and 103(1) read with 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of Scorpio vehicle as dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is a general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The petitioner neither
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37524 of 2025(4) dt.14-11-2025 2/2 demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. The other coaccused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 27.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55271/2025. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 77/2025, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T