← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18955/2017dismissed

Md. Saddam @ Saddam Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18955 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2016 Thana -PHULWARI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. MD. SADDAM @ SADDAM HUSSAIN aged about 23 years, S/o Md. Iqbal Mallick R/o Khalilpura, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Brijnandan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Phulwari Sharif P.S.Case No.46 of 2016 for the offences under Section 439 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and later on his transpired during the course of investigation. The case is under Section 398 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody since 5.9.2016.

It is also submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the petitioner is accused in seven other cases and he is on bail in all those seven cases.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of nature of the case as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18955 of 2017 (2) dt.02-05-2017 2/2 well as the fact that the petitioner is accused in seven other cases and so far as submissions that the other co-accused, have been granted bail is concerned, from perusal of the order sheet, it appears that both the accused have no criminal antecedent. Considering this aspect of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U