Sagar Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1170 of 2014 ====================================================== Sagar Devi, Wife of Shyam Paswan, Resident of Village- Bedaulbaj P.S Purnahiya Distt Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Director General of Police. Government of Bihar Patna.

3. Inspector General of Police. Muzaffarpur.

4. D.I.G (Deputy) Inspector General Tirhut Range. District - Muzaffarpur.

5. Superintendent of Police. District - Sitamarhi.

6. D.S.P (Deputy Superintendent of Police) Seohar.

7. Officer In-charge Purnahia P.S. District- Seohar.

8. Chedi Paswan Son of Gultan Paswan.

9. Seo Shankar Paswan Son of Jettan Paswan.

10. Lalann Paswan Son of Deepak Paswan.

11. Chait Paswan Son of Sonfi Paswan.

12. Dharmendra Singh, Son of Braj Kishore Singh Respondents No. 8 to 12 Resident of Village Pedaulbagh P.S Purnaihia. District Seohar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG-2 for the State.

The present writ application has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to further investigate the case and arrest the respondents no. 8 to 12, who are named in the F.I.R. of Purnahia P.S. Case No. 91 of 2013 instituted on 29.11.2013 for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that her son was killed for which F.I.R. was lodged and five persons

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1170 of 2014 (3) dt.24-07-2015 2/2 were made named accused. However, the police in collusion had not sent them up for trial and has rather shown two other persons to be the culprit and one has also been arrested. Learned counsel for the State submits that now the chargesheet has been submitted and the matter is before the Court and thus the petitioner has her remedy to file an appropriate application before the Court concerned if she is aggrieved by the action of the police.

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to move before the Court below in accordance with law.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T