Sunita Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19172 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Sunita Devi, wife of Brajesh Narayan Duey, Resident of village- Sehan, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
2. Kumari Babita, D/o of Devnath, Resident of village- Digghi, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, of Human Resources Department, Bihar at Patna.
2. The District Appellate Authority of appointment of teacher, DistrictKaimur at Bhabua.
3. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua.
4. The District Education Officer, Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
5. The Block Development Officer, Chand, Kaimur at Bhabua.
6. The Block Extension Education Officer, Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
7. The Panchayat Sewak, Panchayat Siyarampur, P.S.- Chand, DistrictKaimur at Bhabua.
8. Smt. Premlata Kumari W/o Dularchandra Ram, Resident of VillageJamalpur, Pateri, Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
9. Bandana Devi W/O Gorakh Kumar Resident of village- Digghi, P.O.- Pateri, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, A.C. to A.A.G.15. For the Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Radha Mohan Pandey, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority, challenging the order dated 13.10.2014, passed in Appeal No. 07/2013 by the Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Kaimur at Bhabua.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19172 of 2014 (4) dt.08-09-2017 2/2 Permission is accorded.
The petitioners shall file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days from the date of the order, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law within the statutory period.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were granted interim relief by this Court on 17.03.2016. The petitioners will be at liberty to file a separate application before the State Appellate Authority, if so advised, for any interim relief during the pendency of the appeal, within a period of ten days from the date of filing of the appeal. The said application filed by the petitioners shall be disposed of within a period of twenty days.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U