← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38797/2025bail granted

Bablu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-05Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38797 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2025 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Bablu Sah Son of Madan Sah R/O Vill- Bhatgama, Ward No. 06, Jhakhra, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case no.71 of 2025 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. As per the prosecution case, a secret information having been received that the petitioner is involved in the business of liquor, the police party conducted raid and 116.250 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No recovery has been made from the physical or conscious possession of the petitioner and the recovery has been shown from his house which is a joint family property and no liability can be fixed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38797 of 2025(3) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 upon this petitioner with regard to the seized recovery. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that no independent witness is there on the seizure list further indicating violation of mandatory provisions of the B.N.N.S. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case no.71 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T