Taiyab Ali @ Taiyab Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37675 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-610 Year-2024 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Taiyab Ali @ Taiyab Alam Son of Alim Mian Resident of Village- Sahlaur, P.S.- Sarai O.P., District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,74,352,351(2),3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons were abusing the informant and when her husband objected, accused Asim assaulted her husband by tangi causing injury on head while petitioner assaulted her husband by sword causing injury on head. Further, other accused persons also abused and assaulted.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37675 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the husband of the informant by sword causing injury on head, but then, the injury report negates the allegation as the injury has been found to be caused by hard and blunt substance when sword is a sharp edged weapon and the injury has been opined to be simple. The learned counsel fairly submits that at the time of filing of the anticipatory bail application, he was not having a copy of the injury report, but after filing of the anticipatory bail application the injury report was obtained, as such, based on the injury report, the said submission has been made.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Pachrukhi P. S. Case No.610 of 2024, subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37675 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T