Parmod Kumar Chaudhary @ Pramod Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40728 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Rohtas ====================================================== Parmod Kumar Chaudhary @ Pramod Chaudhary S/O Vijay Chaudhary R/O Village- Amara Talab, P.O- Karwandiya, P.S- Sasaram (M), Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Kiran Devi W/O Parmod Kumar Chaudhary @ Pramod Chaudhary R/O Village- Amara Talab, P.O- Karwandiya, P.S- Sasaram(M), Distt.- Rohtas and at present D/O- Shatrudhan Ray, Resident of Chitragupt Colony, Bikramganj, P.O and P.S- Bikramganj, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishor Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2023 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.252 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3.

The case of the complainant, in brief, is that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner on 21.05.2013, as per Hindu rites and rituals, whereafter the complainant had gone to

2/4 her matrimonial home, however, after sometime, the accused persons, including the petitioner herein, started torturing her on account of nonfulfillment of demand of Rs.5 lakh by way of dowry and thereafter, two children were also born out of the said wedlock, however, ultimately she was ousted from her matrimonial home along with her children.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is having a clean antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted, by referring to paragraph no.10 of the present petition, that the petitioner is ready and willing to keep his wife i.e. the opposite party no. 2complainant with due honour and dignity and he is also ready to participate in mediation proceedings, if any, to be initiated by the Ld. Court below, in order to resolve the matrimonial disputes amicably. 5.

Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant

3/4 of anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to direct the petitioner to surrender before the learned court of SDJM, Bikramganj, Rohtas, in connection with Complaint Case No. 252 of 2019, within a period of four weeks from today, whereupon the petitioner shall be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on the very same day and then the learned court below shall issue notice to the complainant-wife and hold mediation proceeding in between the petitioner and his wife with a view to settle the matrimonial disputes between them amicably.

7.

The learned court below is directed to take a final call with regard to either confirming the provisional bail to be granted to the petitioner or revoking the same subject to outcome of the mediation proceeding as also considering the case of the petitioner on merits, without being prejudiced by the dismissal of his bail petition by

4/4 the learned court below.

8.

In the meantime, for a period of four weeks from today, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner herein.

9.

The present petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U T