Dinesh Ray @ Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42577 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== Dinesh Ray @ Dinesh Yadav Son of Subhash Ray R/O Village- Dhupnagar, Mathiya, P.S.- Khaira, Dist.- Saran, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandrakishore Kumar, Adv.

For the informant : Mr. Avinash Raj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024 dated 11.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter by strangulating her due to non-fulfillment of demand of bullet motorcycle as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42577 of 2024(2) dt.30-08-2024 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the informant's daughter. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and he has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased who killed her on account of dowry.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, The petition is rejected and the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below concerned within six weeks from the date of this order and pray for regular bail, the learned Court below will consider his prayer for regular bail in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

7. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T