Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18103/2017bail granted

Krishana Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18103 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Krishana Manjhi Son of late Phaguni Manjhi Resident of Village Irki, P.S. and Distt Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.36 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 37(a)(b)(c) of Excise Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has remained in custody for more than three months. So far criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, it has been submitted that he is accused in one more case but in that case, he is on bail. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, no doubt the petitioner is accused in one more case but considering quantity of the liquor as well as the period of his custody, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18103 of 2017 (2) dt.20-04-2017 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.36 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) In future, if he is found accused in similar type of cases, his bail bond shall automatically be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U