Avinash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19442 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -404 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Avinash Yadav S/o Ram Lakhan Yadav, R/o Village- Bhisaudi, P.S.- Mugalsarai, District- Chandauti (U.P.).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody on his remand since 29.01.2018 in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 404/17 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had been remanded in connection with the present case on suspicion and till date he has not been placed on T.I. Parade. It is further submitted that the looted motorcycle has not been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has been remanded only on the basis of suspicion. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19442 of 2018 (3) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 404/17, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T