← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48598/2021allowed

Niranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-24Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48598 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

NIRANJAN SINGH Son of Dharmraj Singh Resident of Village - Dhaudarh, P.S. - Sasaram (M), District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 2.

Laddu Singh Son of Dharmraj Singh Resident of Village - Dhaudarh, P.S. - Sasaram (M), District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

Paramjeet Singh Son of Shyam Bihari Singh Resident of Village - Dhaudarh, P.S. - Sasaram (M), District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 4.

Harigovind Singh Son of Late Ramawtar Singh Resident of Village - Dhaudarh, P.S. - Sasaram (M), District - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Prakash Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application with regard to petitioner no.2 (Laddu Singh).

Permission is accorded.

The application with regard to petitioner no.2 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard both sides.

Petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4 apprehend their arrest in Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.382 of 2020 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48598 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have committed no offence and have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioners rather the alleged recovery has been made from Chhotki Charkha forest. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.382 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T