Mazibul Haque v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49013 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2021 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Mazibul Haque, Son Of Md. Anwar @ Anwar Ali Resident Of Jaipur, P.S. - Kateya, District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 414/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the apprehended accused disclosed that the stolen motorcycle, which he was riding, was purchased from the petitioner. Further disclosed that he along with petitioner are involved in sale and purchase of stolen motorcycle. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged stolen motorcycle was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49013 of 2021(3) dt.30-06-2022 2/2 apprehended accused in order to save himself falsely implicated the petitioner. It is also submitted that confession in police custody has no evidentiary value.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kateya P. S. Case No.218 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T