Ram Pravesh Choudhary @ Ram Pravesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39718 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2022 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
RAM PRAVESH CHOUDHARY @ RAM PRAVESH YADAV S/o Late Chandradeo Choudhary 2.
MIRTUNJAY YADAV S/o Ram Pravesh Choudhary @ Ram Pravesh Yadav 3.
RAJIV YADAV @ RAJIV KUMAR YADAV S/o Ram Pravesh Choudhary @ Ram Pravesh Yadav All are R/o village- Manjhwalia, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 354 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.
The informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to way, her relative petitioner no. 2 assaulted Pradeep Yadav by means of an iron rod causing injury on his head thereafter petitioner no. 3 assaulted Dilip Yadav by spade causing injury on his head and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39718 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 petitioner no. 1 snatched her Mangalsutra and petitioner no. 3 further took out Rs.10,000/- from the pocket of Pradeep Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are relatives and agnates and the injuries suffered by the injured is simple in nature which amply demonstrates that petitioners never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is further submitted that the present occurrence is alleged to have taken place on account of dispute relating to land.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 120 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T