Ranjit Kumar @ Tunni Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48777 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar @ Tunni Kumar Son Of Satendra Sharma Resident Of Village - Kurre, Police Station - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is said to have abused the informant. On objection, Ranjit Kumar @ Tunni Kumar (petitioner) hit on the forehead of the informant with an iron rod due to which he received head injury and became unconscious.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48777 of 2021(2) dt.26-04-2022 2/2 implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both side have sustained injury. He submits that the injury no. 2 found on the informant is simple in nature and injury no. 1 opinion reserved. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 41 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T