Vivek Raj v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18714 of 2017 (2) dt.15-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18714 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -330 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Vivek Raj, son of Late Rabindra Kumar Sinha, resident of VillageMajhwari, P.S.- Simri, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (Model) Town P.S. Case No. 330 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner being the head clerk in District Transport Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram used to issue driving license without entering memo number and it appears that he used to take bribe from Amit Kumar.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner without any fault is suffering in custody since 17.03.2017, the petitioner has not committed any irregularity, as per the order of the informant everything was done, Amit Kumar caught with cash

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18714 of 2017 (2) dt.15-05-2017 of Rs. 1,10,000/- has already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. no. 20582 of 2017 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No. 330 of 2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T