Pravesh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20027 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2010 Thana -ARA MUFFSIL District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Pravesh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Yadav Son of Chirkut @ Bikarma Yadav, Resident of Village- Bagha Kol Tetariya, P.S. Ara Muffasil, District Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advpcate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S.Case No. 47 of 2010 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 147, 149, 307, 148 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused is that they have entered into the house of the informant, killed the husband of informant and also fired on the informant and later on killed mother-in-law of the informant and informant succumbed to the injuries.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and he appears to be a member of mob only and there is no criminal antecedent against him and he is in custody for ten months. Heard learned APP also, who could not controvert the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20027 of 2017 (3) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 above submission.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S.Case No. 47 of 2010, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U