Jhawar Yadav @ Rajeev Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41901 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2023 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Jhawar Yadav @ Rajeev Ranjan Son Of Dinesh Prasad Yadav Mohalla Ramnagar Near Mahmood Chowk D. S. College Road Ward No 25 Katihar, Police Station- Katihar Town, District- Katihar 2.

Bumbum Yadav D@ Prashant Ranjan Son Of Dinesh Prasad Yadav Mohalla Ramnagar Near Mahmood Chowk D. S. College Road Ward No 25 Katihar, Police Station- Katihar Town, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 427, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the learned court below.

3. As per the prosecution case, there is allegation of demand of ransom against the petitioners and also allegation of open firing alleged against them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41901 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/2 allegation against the petitioners. He submits that there is compromise between the parties. He further submits that petitioner are students. He submits that there is dispute between the parties with regard to path. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that there is compromise between the parties, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Katihar Town P.S. Case No.145 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T