Jaychandra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38228 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2026 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Jaychandra Yadav S/o Ram Lakhan Yadav @ Lakhan Yadav Resident of villKamalpur, PS- Rahika, District- Madhubani 2.
Shambhu Yadav @ Shambhu Kumar Yadav S/o Ganga Yadav @ Ganga Prasad Yadav Resident of vill- Kamalpur, PS- Rahika, District- Madhubani 3.
Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar Yadav S/o Uday Chandra Yadav Resident of vill- Kamalpur, PS- Rahika, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Md. Soban Asghar Ashad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, brutally assaulted the nephew of informant by means of iron rod, iron chain, etc. as a result of which he sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. On a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38228 of 2026(3) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 trivial issue, altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners. Case and counter case. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and injury, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P. S. Case No. 80 of 2026, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T