Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1022/2013dismissed

Sarwan Yadave v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-05Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1022 of 2013 ====================================================== Sarwan Yadave son of late Munarika Yadave, resident of villageBhaluawar, P.O.-Darwa, P.S.-Upahara, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The State of Bihar 2.The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.The Director General of Police, Bihar 4.The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad 5.The officer-in-charge Police Station Upahara, District- Aurangabad 6.Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Hamed Nagar, Upahara, District-Auranabad sponsored by Punjab National Bank 7.The Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Hamed Nagar, Upahara, District- Aurangabad sponsored by Punjab National Bank 8.The Chairman, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Meena Plaza, South Museum, Patna- 800001 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.K. Agrwal, G.A.-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-01-2015 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondent nos.6 to 8 are present.

The grievance of the petitioner is that despite lodging information about the commission of a cognizable offence, the officer-in-charge of the Upahara Police Station in the district of Aurangabad has not registered FIR.

Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner gave a written application to the SHO Upahara Police

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1022 of 2013 (2) dt.05-01-2015 2/2 Station on 12th March, 2014 and on that basis Upahara P.S. Case No.12 of 2014 has already been registered for the offence punishable under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and the said case is being investigated upon.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the State at the Bar, I find no merit in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T